1. <button id="qm3rj"><thead id="qm3rj"></thead></button>
      <samp id="qm3rj"></samp>
      <source id="qm3rj"><menu id="qm3rj"><pre id="qm3rj"></pre></menu></source>

      <video id="qm3rj"><code id="qm3rj"></code></video>

        1. <tt id="qm3rj"><track id="qm3rj"></track></tt>
            1. 2.845

              2023影響因子

              (CJCR)

              • 中文核心
              • EI
              • 中國科技核心
              • Scopus
              • CSCD
              • 英國科學(xué)文摘

              留言板

              尊敬的讀者、作者、審稿人, 關(guān)于本刊的投稿、審稿、編輯和出版的任何問(wèn)題, 您可以本頁(yè)添加留言。我們將盡快給您答復。謝謝您的支持!

              姓名
              郵箱
              手機號碼
              標題
              留言?xún)热?/th>
              驗證碼

              形式背景上近似推理生成決策蘊涵研究

              張家錄 吳霞

              張家錄, 吳霞. 形式背景上近似推理生成決策蘊涵研究. 自動(dòng)化學(xué)報, 2024, 50(11): 2286?2300 doi: 10.16383/j.aas.c220705
              引用本文: 張家錄, 吳霞. 形式背景上近似推理生成決策蘊涵研究. 自動(dòng)化學(xué)報, 2024, 50(11): 2286?2300 doi: 10.16383/j.aas.c220705
              Zhang Jia-Lu, Wu Xia. Study on the approximate reasoning models of decision implication in formal decision context. Acta Automatica Sinica, 2024, 50(11): 2286?2300 doi: 10.16383/j.aas.c220705
              Citation: Zhang Jia-Lu, Wu Xia. Study on the approximate reasoning models of decision implication in formal decision context. Acta Automatica Sinica, 2024, 50(11): 2286?2300 doi: 10.16383/j.aas.c220705

              形式背景上近似推理生成決策蘊涵研究

              doi: 10.16383/j.aas.c220705 cstr: 32138.14.j.aas.c220705
              基金項目: 湖南省自然科學(xué)基金(2020JJ4561, 2020JJ4381), 湖南省信息和計算科學(xué)專(zhuān)業(yè)校企合作創(chuàng )新創(chuàng )業(yè)教育基地(2020-301)資助
              詳細信息
                作者簡(jiǎn)介:

                張家錄:湘南學(xué)院數學(xué)與信息科學(xué)學(xué)院教授. 主要研究方向為智能信息處理, 知識發(fā)現和非經(jīng)典數理邏輯與近似推理. E-mail: zjl0735@163.com

                吳霞:湘南學(xué)院數學(xué)與信息科學(xué)學(xué)院教授. 主要研究方向為智能信息處理, 非經(jīng)典數理邏輯與近似推理. 本文通信作者. E-mail: wuxia351@163.com

              Study on the Approximate Reasoning Models of Decision Implication in Formal Decision Context

              Funds: Supported by Natural Science Foundation of Hunan Province (2020JJ4561, 2020JJ4381) and Information and Computing Science University-enterprise Cooperation Innovation and Entrepreneurship Education Base of Hunan Province (2020-301)
              More Information
                Author Bio:

                ZHANG Jia-Lu Professor at the College of Mathematics and Information Science, Xiangnan University. His research interest covers intelligent information processing, knowledge discovery, and nonclassical mathematical logic and approximate reasoning

                WU Xia Professor at the College of Mathematics and Information Science, Xiangnan University. Her research interest covers intelligent information processing, nonclassical mathematical logic and approximate reasoning. Corresponding author of this paper

              • 摘要: 基于形式背景獲取決策蘊涵、概念規則等知識是數據分析、機器學(xué)習的重要研究?jì)热葜? 首先, 利用屬性邏輯語(yǔ)義對決策蘊涵的特性進(jìn)行刻畫(huà). 其次, 在經(jīng)典二值邏輯框架下分析決策蘊涵、概念規則的基于全蘊涵三I推理思想及分離規則(Modus ponens, MP)和逆分離規則(Modus tonens, MT)的近似推理模式的特征, 證明決策蘊涵的MP、MT近似推理結論是決策蘊涵, 概念規則的MP、MT近似推理結論是概念規則等結論. 引進(jìn)屬性邏輯公式的偽距離, 在屬性邏輯偽距離空間中分析推理對象范圍參數變化對決策蘊涵MP、MT近似推理結論的影響. 最后, 提出若干通過(guò)MP、MT近似推理生成決策蘊涵、概念規則及擬決策蘊涵的模式和方法, 數值實(shí)驗驗證了所提方法的有效性.
              • 表  1  形式背景$K=(G,M,I)$

                Table  1  A formal context $K=(G,M,I)$

                $G$$a_1$$a_2$$a_3$$a_4$$a_5$
                $u_1$11001
                $u_2$00110
                $u_3$10100
                $u_4$01010
                $u_5$01011
                $u_6$10101
                下載: 導出CSV

                表  2  決策形式背景$K=(G,C,D,I,J)$

                Table  2  A formal decision context $K=(G,C,D,I,J)$

                $G$$a_1$$a_2$$a_3$$a_4$$d_1$$d_2$$d_3$
                $u_1$1111101
                $u_2$0010010
                $u_3$1000011
                $u_4$0110100
                下載: 導出CSV

                表  3  決策形式背景$K=(G,C,D,I,J)$

                Table  3  A formal decision context $K=(G,C,D,I,J)$

                $G$$a_1$$a_2$$a_3$$a_4$$a_5$$a_6$$d_1$$d_2$$d_3$
                $u_1$110011101
                $u_2$001111110
                $u_3$101001001
                $u_4$010101100
                $u_5$010111110
                $u_6$101011011
                $u_7$011100111
                下載: 導出CSV

                表  4  生成的擬決策蘊涵個(gè)數

                Table  4  The number of generated quasi-decision implications

                數據組別生成的擬決策蘊涵個(gè)數
                數據組162
                數據組258
                數據組374
                數據組471
                下載: 導出CSV

                表  5  生成的擬決策蘊涵后件與后件合取公式的偽距離

                Table  5  The pseudo-metric between the consequent of generated quasi-decision implications and the consequent conjunctive

                數據組別最大偽距離最小偽距離
                數據組10.1950.147
                數據組20.1890.160
                數據組30.1970.152
                數據組40.1940.161
                下載: 導出CSV

                表  6  測試數據變化生成的擬決策蘊涵表

                Table  6  A table of generated quasi-decision implication as test data changes

                數據組別擬決策蘊涵個(gè)數最小偽距離
                數據組130.0082
                數據組250.0157
                數據組380.0256
                數據組4120.0324
                數據組5160.0418
                數據組6210.0527
                數據組7250.0619
                數據組8290.0718
                數據組9340.0821
                數據組10390.0913
                下載: 導出CSV

                表  7  后件集對結論的支持度和獲取擬決策蘊涵時(shí)間成本對比

                Table  7  Comparison of the support degree of consequent set to the conclusion and time consumption of obtaining quasi-decision implications

                數據組別$L$的后件集對結論支持度$\tau_{\Delta}$方式1)總時(shí)間成本(s)方式2)總時(shí)間成本 (s)增量獲取所用時(shí)間成本(s)
                數據組10.9330.2040.2230.103
                數據組20.9230.2830.3040.147
                數據組30.9140.3610.3890.198
                數據組40.9030.4500.4840.258
                數據組50.8930.5390.2580.326
                下載: 導出CSV
                1. <button id="qm3rj"><thead id="qm3rj"></thead></button>
                  <samp id="qm3rj"></samp>
                  <source id="qm3rj"><menu id="qm3rj"><pre id="qm3rj"></pre></menu></source>

                  <video id="qm3rj"><code id="qm3rj"></code></video>

                    1. <tt id="qm3rj"><track id="qm3rj"></track></tt>
                        亚洲第一网址_国产国产人精品视频69_久久久久精品视频_国产精品第九页
                      1. [1] 張文修, 梁怡, 吳偉志. 信息系統與知識發(fā)現. 北京: 科學(xué)出版社, 2003.

                        Zhang Wen-Xiu, Liang Yi, Wu Wei-Zhi. Information Systems and Knowledge Discoveries. Beijing: Science Press, 2003.
                        [2] 李金海, 魏玲, 張卓, 翟巖慧, 張濤, 智慧來(lái), 等. 概念格理論與方法及其研究展望. 模式識別與人工智能, 2020, 33(7): 619?642

                        Li Jin-Hai, Wei Ling, Zhang Zhuo, Zhai Yan-Hui, Zhang Tao, Zhi Hui-Lai, et al. Concept lattice theory and method and their research prospect. Pattern Recognition and Artificial Intelligence, 2020, 33(7): 619?642
                        [3] Ganter B, Wille R. Formal Concept Analysis Mathematical Foundations 3. Berlin: Germany Springer-Verlag, 1999.
                        [4] Li J H, Mei C L, Kumar C A, Zhang X. On rule acquisition in decision formal contexts. International Journal of Machine Learning and Cybernetics, 2013, 4(6): 721?731 doi: 10.1007/s13042-013-0150-z
                        [5] Zhai Y H, Li D Y, Qu K S. Decision implications: A logical point of view. International Journal of Machine Learning and Cybernetics, 2014, 5: 509?516 doi: 10.1007/s13042-013-0204-2
                        [6] Zhai Y H, Li D Y, Qu K S. Fuzzy decision implications. Knowledge-Based Systems, 2013, 37: 230?236 doi: 10.1016/j.knosys.2012.08.004
                        [7] 賈楠, 張少霞, 翟巖慧, 李德玉. 決策蘊涵上的推理規則和推理過(guò)程研究. 計算機科學(xué)與探索, 2020, 14(2): 344?352

                        Jia Nan, Zhang Shao-Xia, Zhai Yan-Hui, Li De-Yu. Study of inference rules and deduction process on decision implications. Journal of Frontiers of Computer Science and Technology, 2020, 14(2): 344?352
                        [8] 王琪, 李德玉, 翟巖慧, 張少霞. 含參決策蘊涵. 計算機研究與發(fā)展, 2022, 59(9): 2066?2074

                        Wang Qi, Li De-Yu, Zhai Yan-Hui, Zhang Shao-Xia. Parameterized fuzzy decision implication. Journal of Computer Research and Development, 2022, 59(9): 2066?2074
                        [9] 張少霞, 李德玉, 翟巖慧. 邏輯型決策蘊涵. 鄭州大學(xué)學(xué)報 (理學(xué)版), 2020, 52(1): 1?7

                        Zhang Shao-Xia, Li De-Yu, Zhai Yan-Hui. Logic-type decision implication. Journal of Zhengzhou University (Natural Science), 2020, 52(1): 1?7
                        [10] Zhang S X, Li D Y, Zhai Y H, Kang X P. A comparative study of decision implication, concept rule and granule. Information Sciences, 2020, 508: 33?49 doi: 10.1016/j.ins.2019.08.053
                        [11] 李金海, 李玉斐, 米允龍, 吳偉志. 多粒度形式概念分析的介粒度標記方法. 計算機研究與發(fā)展, 2020, 57(2): 447?458

                        Li Jin-Hai, Li Yu-Fei, Mi Yun-Long, Wu Wei-Zhi. Meso-granularity labeled method for multi-granularity formal concept analysis. Journal of Computer Research and Development, 2020, 57(2): 447?458
                        [12] 李金海, 王飛, 吳偉志, 徐偉華, 楊習貝, 折延宏. 基于粒計算的多粒度數據分析方法綜述. 數據采集與處理, 2021, 36(3): 418?435

                        Li Jin-Hai, Wang Fei, Wu Wei-Zhi, Xu Wei-Hua, Yang Xi-Bei, She Yan-Hong. Review of multi-granularity data analysis methods based on granular computing. Journal of Data Acquisition and Processing, 2021, 36(3): 418?435
                        [13] Wang G J, Zhou H J. Quantitative logic. Information Science, 2009, 179: 226?247 doi: 10.1016/j.ins.2008.09.008
                        [14] Linden G, Smith B, York J. Amazon.com recommendations: Item-to-item collaborative filtering. IEEE Internet Computing, 2003, 7(1): 76?80 doi: 10.1109/MIC.2003.1167344
                        [15] Freyer D A, Hsieh Y H, Levin S R, Pines J M, Mareiniss D P, Mohareb A, et al. Goolgle flu trends: Correlation with emergency department influenza rates and crowding metrics. Clinical Infectious Diseases, 2012, 54(4): 463?469 doi: 10.1093/cid/cir883
                        [16] 梁吉業(yè), 馮晨嬌, 宋鵬. 大數據相關(guān)分析綜述. 計算機學(xué)報, 2016, 39(1): 1?18

                        Liang Ji-Ye, Feng Chen-Jiao, Song Peng. A survey on correlation analysis of big data. Chinese Journal of Computers, 2016, 39(1): 1?18
                        [17] 張家錄, 吳霞. 屬性邏輯的近似推理模式研究. 計算機科學(xué)與探索, 2023, 17(4): 848?856

                        Zhang Jia-Lu, Wu Xia. Study on the approximate reasoning models based on the attribute logic. Journal of Frontiers of Computer Science and Technology, 2023, 17(4): 848?856
                        [18] 王國俊. 非經(jīng)典數理邏輯與近似推理. 北京: 科學(xué)出版社, 2000.

                        Wang Guo-Jun. Non-classical Mathematical Logic and Approximate Reasoning. Beijing: Science Press, 2000.
                        [19] 王國俊. 模糊推理的全蘊涵三I算法. 中國科學(xué)(E輯), 1999, 29(1): 43?53

                        Wang Guo-Jun. The triple I algorithm for all implication of fuzzy reasoning. Science in China (Series E), 1999, 29(1): 43?53
                        [20] 張文修, 魏玲, 祁建軍. 概念格的屬性約簡(jiǎn)理論與方法. 中國科學(xué)(E輯), 2005, 35(6): 628?639

                        Zhang Wen-Xiu, Wei Ling, Qi Jian-Jun. Attribute reduction theory and approach to concept lattice. Science in China (Series E), 2005, 35(6): 628?639
                        [21] 羅佳琪, 吳霞, 張家錄, 杜佳甜. 基于形式概念的對象粒的屬性公式描述. 模糊系統與數學(xué), 2020, 34(1): 41?48

                        Luo Jia-Qi, Wu Xia, Zhang Jia-Lu, Du Jia-Tian. The description of object granules by using attribute logic formulas based on formal concept. Fuzzy Systems and Mathematics, 2020, 34(1): 41?48
                        [22] Zhang J L, Wu X, Lu R H. Decision analysis methods combining quantitative logic and fuzzy soft sets. International Journal of Fuzzy Systems, 2020, 22(6): 1801?1814 doi: 10.1007/s40815-020-00899-6
                        [23] 吳霞, 張家錄. 基于面向屬性(對象)概念的對象粒的屬性公式描述. 模式識別與人工智能, 2020, 33(9): 767?775

                        Wu Xia, Zhang Jia-Lu. Attribute logical formulas description of object granules based on the property-oriented (object-oriented) concepts. Pattern Recognition and Artificial Intelligence, 2020, 33(9): 767?775
                        [24] 張家錄, 陳雪剛, 趙曉東. 經(jīng)典命題邏輯的概率語(yǔ)義及其應用. 計算機學(xué)報, 2014, 37(8): 1775?1785

                        Zhang Jia-Lu, Chen Xue-Gang, Zhao Xiao-Dong. Theory of probability semantics of classical propositional logic and its application. Chinese Journal of Computers, 2014, 37(8): 1775?1785
                        [25] Mi Y L, Liu W Q, Shi Y, Li J H. Semi-supervised concept learning by concept-cognitive learning and concept space. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 2022, 34(5): 2429?2442 doi: 10.1109/TKDE.2020.3010918
                      2. 加載中
                      3. 計量
                        • 文章訪(fǎng)問(wèn)數:  261
                        • HTML全文瀏覽量:  46
                        • PDF下載量:  21
                        • 被引次數: 0
                        出版歷程
                        • 收稿日期:  2022-09-06
                        • 錄用日期:  2023-01-14
                        • 網(wǎng)絡(luò )出版日期:  2023-10-07
                        • 刊出日期:  2024-11-20

                        目錄

                          /

                          返回文章
                          返回